there is hardly a method you know
it’s a broken poem /
started up yesterday
this is an excursus, of sorts
I used to think that the rigid way worship was conceived had
to do with the seminary I went to; two things, though, changed my mind.
the first is relatively
innocuous, but informing
When I was planning a worship service for chapel I had kind
of had it with the authoritarian grip on chapel services. So rather than
submitting the boilerplate worship service I tried planning something
different. Not radically different, but different. After sharing my reasoning,
the Dean of the Chapel was on-board & helping me plan the particulars.
For as rigid as the authority figures can be, it turns out there
is still room for deviation.
the other observation
should have been more obvious sooner
If other seminaries are more flexible in worship training, how
come every Lutheran service is basically the same?
Well, there are probably many reasons why worship is so
generic, but one has to do with the worship commentaries of the ELCA.
not only are they bland,
but they also speak with this weird air of authority
An excerpt:
“First this, then such-and-such, after you can do doodle-hay or doodle-hoe, but then
you will finish with that.”
Okay, that’s not really in the commentary, but you get the
picture.
the entire talk about
worship lacks imagination
I might even say it stifles imagination by what it includes, as
well as what it precludes.
While the commentary talks about flexibility, its general acceptance
of many things leaves the impression that the service just won’t work if we don’t
sing particular hymns from the hymnal at the right time.
This general insistence and lack of genuine alternatives simultaneous
stifle imagination and bars innovation. Perhaps not explicitly or even
intentionally, but to someone trying to learn and learn from the service, that
is the outcome.
Okay, I know I haven’t spoken about the sending, but all the
reading I’ve done has been highly unsatisfactory.
I think this project is going to take a little longer. The
next four entries will go through the four parts of the service using formal
resources. After those reflections I hope to examine something more, I don’t
know, helpful...
Well said. As one who is also puzzled by the worship commentary, I appreciate your critique.
ReplyDeleteI have often wondered where my own notion that worship can be creative and open new channels for the Holy Spirit to move through (I'm pretty sure camp had something to do with that).
The commentary's specificity has also confused me over the years. I continue to wonder why the ELCA publishes such a rigid form for worship. I don't really have a good answer to suggest for that one. I actually tried articulating a suggestion just now that sounded inauthentic even as I typed...
Looking forward to reading your future reflections on this.